|

What
Drove Laid-Off Lawyer-Suicide's Battle for Success?
By Marisa McQuilken and
Jeff Jeffrey
The National Law Journal
May 1, 2009
WASHINGTON — In his 59
years, Mark Levy, head of Kilpatrick Stockton's Supreme Court
practice, achieved more than many lawyers ever hope to. But friends
and former colleagues believe he felt the pressure to accomplish
even more.
After spending the past
five years at Kilpatrick, Levy was found dead in his office Thursday
morning, in what police are investigating as a gun-related suicide.
Friends describe Levy as an upbeat, but reserved person, who always
turned out top-quality briefs and often arrived at the office before
the sun came up. His career included stints at some of the most
prestigious law firms around, as well as the Department of Justice.
But friends say he wasn't
satisfied. And just two days prior to his death, Kilpatrick laid off
24 associates and counsel, including Levy, according to a close
friend of Levy. (Kilpatrick Stockton confirmed Levy's death in a
statement, but declined to comment on whether he was let go, and
what procedures the firm follows when laying off personnel.)
Levy, who joined Kilpatrick
as a counsel in 2004, had struggled to establish his appellate and
Supreme Court practice, according to lawyers that knew him. Levy,
who argued a total of 16 times before the high court, won a case for
DuPont last October in Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont
Savings. But prior to winning that employee benefits matter,
Levy hadn't argued in front of the high court since 1989.
"I tried to help Mark in
terms of his practice, in terms of referring clients, and so on,"
says E. Donald Elliott, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, who
had been friends with Levy since their days at Yale Law School. "I
just noted that he had moved from firm to firm ... I wondered, but
he always assured me that everything was okay."
A close friend, who asked
not to be named, says Levy called her Wednesday afternoon after he
was laid off, and the two chatted about his future for 30 minutes.
Levy, the friend says, did not have a job lined up. "I was telling
him his departure was an opportunity to find something he was
excited about," she says. "He seemed like he was concerned about
what he was going to do." Still, she says he was looking forward to
an upcoming trip to Italy to celebrate his 60th birthday with his
family.
Levy's age, however, may
have been a factor in his unhappiness, according to psychologists.
"At age 60, you're starting
to think of retirement. You're thinking that you should be immune to
layoffs due to your prominence and your position," says Sherry
Molock, a professor of clinical psychology at George Washington
University, who studies suicidal behaviors. "You've paid your dues.
You feel that you should have arrived by now."
In the course of his
private practice career, Levy spent time at Covington & Burling,
Mayer Brown, Howrey, and finally, Kilpatrick Stockton. Friends and
contemporaries point to his frequent movement between firms as
evidence that he had trouble establishing a solid book of business.
Axinn, Veltrop &
Harkrider's D.C. managing partner John Briggs, who worked with Levy
at Howrey, says Levy struggled to maintain an active appellate
practice. "He wasn't getting as much work as he wanted to get, and
he left because he felt he would be more appreciated, and get more
work, at Kilpatrick," says Briggs, who previously chaired Howrey's
antitrust group.
At Howrey, Briggs says he
often turned to Levy for appellate work. Levy was a "hard-working
and brilliant" lawyer who often got to work before dawn, he recalls.
Appellate practice, Briggs
notes, is often solitary, and he says Levy's work habits reflected
this. "I think he put himself under more pressure than perhaps
others put themselves under," Briggs says. "This is a man of
enormous background, talent and ability."
It's no secret that
building a successful appellate practice can be tough. It's an area
that depends heavily on an ability to network and get referrals from
friends and colleagues.
"It's helpful to have a
firm that's behind you as well, and be able to draw upon the other
lawyers in the firm, and the clients that have strong relationships
with the firm," says Jonathan Franklin, who heads Fulbright &
Jaworski's Supreme Court group.
SG HOPES
By most measurements,
Levy's resume was an impressive one. After graduating from Yale Law,
he landed a prestigious clerkship with the late Judge Gerhard Gesell
of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. He became
an associate at Covington & Burling before joining the U.S.
Department of Justice as an assistant to the solicitor general.
In 1986, he became a senior
associate in the Washington office of what was then Mayer, Brown &
Platt, now Mayer Brown. He showed promise there from the start. At
the time, partner Stephen Shapiro, a former deputy solicitor
general, said the firm was confident that Levy would soon make
partner.
He eventually did, but the
competition at Mayer was tough. The same year that Levy joined, the
firm also brought on current partner Andrew Frey, who to-date has
argued a record-breaking 65 times before the Supreme Court, Kenneth
Geller, now Mayer Brown's vice chairman, and Kathryn Oberly, now a
judge for the D.C. Court of Appeals. Geller remembers Levy as "an
excellent lawyer and a very sweet guy," adding, "We're all in a
state of shock."
In 1993, Levy, a Clinton
loyalist and classmate of Bill and Hillary at Yale Law, was tapped
for an appointment at the Justice Department as deputy assistant
attorney general of the appellate section in the Civil Division.
But friends say his
aspirations exceeded that. Shapiro says, "Mark was the most proud of
putting on the striped suit," a reference to the morning coat worn
by many in the solicitor general's office when they argue at the
Supreme Court. "He was certainly considered, and was interested in
being solicitor general under the Clinton administration, and he
never quite made it." says Willkie Farr's Elliott. "I guess my
thought about it is that maybe he never attracted the same kind of
client following that some of the people did who became solicitor
general."
During Hillary Clinton's
presidential run, Levy and his wife, Judith, continued to be big
supporters. The Center for Responsive Politics shows Levy donated
$4,600 to the campaign; his wife gave $2,300. Some friends believe
he had aspirations to go into the public sector again. (Judith Levy
declined to comment.)
A government job "might
have been a better fit for him," says a friend and former partner
who asked to remain anonymous. "The sort of rough and tumble world
of private practice may not have been the right thing for him."
Supreme Court correspondent
Tony Mauro and reporter Mike Scarcella contributed to this report.
[Index
to Articles]
|