Judge Hammers Firm and Partners, Bemoans Loss of Civility

By Anthony Lin
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
November 30, 2007

A Manhattan federal judge has delivered a lengthy manifesto against declining civility in the legal profession in the course of sanctioning law firm Dorsey & Whitney and two of its partners.

Southern District Judge Harold Baer opened his 129-page decision with a discussion of how "naked competition and singular economic focus of the marketplace have begun to infiltrate the practice of law, subordinating the high standards of service, collegiality and professionalism as a result."

He ended it with his observation that "partners are at times made and retained for their rainmaking skills and not for their legal skill, that the number of billable hours is not only the alpha and omega of bonuses but that these hours - or at least the ones that count - often exclude pro bono hours, or that who gets credit for originating a piece of business can throw a firm into turmoil and prompt internecine struggles, or that the bottom line has eclipsed most everything else for which the practice of law stands or stood to the extent that the practice of law is now frequently described as a business rather than a profession."

The attorney misconduct that spurred the judge to rail against the way the profession is changing arose in the course of a trade secrets lawsuit brought by financial software maker Wolters Kluwers Financial Services Inc. against a rival called Scivantage which had recruited three former Wolters Kluwers employees. The dispute between the parties settled over the summer, but Judge Baer's anger over how discovery proceeded in the case is still evident.

He hammers in particular former Dorsey & Whitney partner Kristan L. Peters, the lead counsel for Wolters Kluwers and, according to the judge, the "driving force behind most of the decisions made by Wolters Kluwers and Dorsey." The judge said Ms. Peters had shown a "studied disregard for the sanctity of court orders."

But the lawyer targeted by the judge struck back hard.

"It is hard to take seriously Judge Baer's alleged concern for professional courtesy when he continues to treat women litigators like second class citizens in his court room, requires attorneys to physically oversee the return of documents in another country within a matter of hours when they are overseas on their anniversary, and sets depositions on Sunday mornings," said Ms. Peters in an e-mail.

"Indeed, when a Catholic lawyer asks for the opportunity to attend church before the Sunday deposition, he mocked the attorney for Catholic observance," she said.

Judge Baer was particularly angry that Ms. Peters and Dorsey & Whitney had used transcripts of depositions that were covered by his protective order in a complaint launching an almost identical lawsuit in federal court in Massachusetts while seeking voluntary dismissal of the New York action. The judge described this as a "bad faith" effort to "judge-shop" and circumvent the New York court's discovery orders.

                          Lawyers Told: Be More Civil

by Audrey Parente
Daytona Beach News Journal (Fl)
February 23, 2004

In the middle of a recent court proceeding, two lawyers squabbled with each other about not returning phone calls and sending bills for copies each didn't think should be paid.

Name-calling ensued.

"I spent 15 minutes of hearing time to address something that should have been addressed outside. It slowed my process down," says Judge J. David Walsh of the Seventh Judicial Circuit.

Incivility in court is a growing problem, and Walsh has been tapped to help find a solution by organizing a peer review program.

Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Harry Lee Anstead has emphasized that all judicial circuits must establish an ongoing effort to improve professionalism among members of the Florida Bar. To meet that need, Seventh Circuit Court Chief Judge Julianne Piggotte approved an administrative order establishing the Peer Review program within the circuit.

The new program is no substitute for disciplinary processes already in place in the court system for malpractice, Walsh says. But peer review is intended to allow judges and lawyers to bring their issues to an impartial panel. The group would include experienced attorneys seeking an informal way of resolving a dispute.

Walsh is looking for volunteers to serve and trying to educate attorneys about the program.

"It's voluntary and educational, not punitive," he says. "We hope a year from now we have something up and running and quite workable."

Peer reviews could help remind attorneys about their own level of professionalism, he says.

"A case we tried here went four weeks and involved the death of an individual. What appeared to happen is, the lawyers forgot they were not the litigants but only the representative of those individuals. They lost sight of that and began going at each other directly," Walsh says. "When they are impolite to each other and call each other names, it affects their clients."

The problem of incivility, he says, goes back a way, and local changes in society over the years have added to the problem in Volusia County.

"Ever since the Watergate years, people have come up with less respect for governmental organizations," Walsh explains. "When I first came to town from New Jersey in 1977, I had served in the Navy in Vietnam and traveled quite a bit, but I wanted a small-firm environment and a trial practice."

The local atmosphere was friendly, and attorneys "hung out" together, he says.

"We used to gather at a waterhole -- Club 92 -- on Speedway (International Boulevard). You would run into the same guy you had been opposing in the courtroom," he says. "It was a great place to unwind, where young lawyers would meet up with old lawyers."

Those days are over, Walsh says.

"The opportunity is not there because people are so busy, so we are struggling to find a way where young lawyers can get together with older lawyers and learn from them," he says. "How can attorneys be more civil to one another?"

One local effort, which began two years ago, has been making some progress, although not enough by itself.

"We call it Inns of Court, which comes from the British system. We created one here in this county spearheaded by Chobee Ebbets," Walsh says. The membership in the Inns of Court is an ever-changing cast of 100 lawyers of all ages and career stages, who get together to create a camaraderie among bar members.

"The difference in the American system and the British system of justice comes from how we educate our lawyers," says Ebbets, a long-time local attorney. "There you have to go through Inns of Court -- a process of learning with your brother and sister lawyers who become your friends. It's like a fraternity process -- you bond."

Ebbets contrasted the English way with the American system.

"Lawyers throughout the country are guilty of the highest levels of discourtesy toward their fellow practitioners. We practice law like it was the Old West," he says. "Here we all go to different law schools and lawyers are very combative. Myself as an example, I have been guilty of saying things to other lawyers I wish I had not said."

He hasn't done that since establishing the Inns of Court program here, because the program has helped him become more keenly aware of his legal peers. The group, with a changing mix of 100 attorneys, gathers for dinners, puts on programs, discusses issues and socializes.

Walsh says Inns of Court meets quarterly and is helping to some extent.

Additional motivation by Judge Piggotte to establish a way to resolve civility problems through peer review will help too, he adds.

"The attorney will fill out a form and send it to the Chief Judge through the local bar president," Walsh says. An appointed panel will sit with the parties to discuss the matter.

"They will talk it through and how it can be resolved," he says. "After 60 days, all the paperwork is destroyed. From our standpoint this might lower the volume a little bit."

http://www.news-journalonline.com/cgi-bin/printme.asp

What Was He Thinking? Let's Try to Guess

South Florida Sun-Sentinel Editorial Board
February 13, 2004

Maybe Broward County Public Defender Al Schreiber was thinking no one would notice. Maybe he was thinking that even if they did, he could always play dumb. Or maybe he was thinking he's been in office so long he can get away with almost anything.

Whatever he was thinking, Schreiber showed appallingly bad judgment, and possibly an ethical lapse as well, when he asked his employees to give money to his daughter's boyfriend so he could compete in professional golf tournaments.

Schreiber apparently learned nothing from recent criticism of County Commissioner Lori Parrish after she sent a memo to lobbyists and others doing business with the county, asking them to hire her son. He also apparently learned nothing from disgraced former Palm Beach County Public Defender Richard Jorandby, who was disbarred, fined and put under house arrest after pressuring employees to donate to his November 2000 re-election campaign.

Schreiber didn't go nearly as far as Jorandby did, and doesn't deserve that kind of punishment. He didn't explicitly threaten to fire anyone if they didn't fork over the money, as Jorandby did. It's not a great stretch to infer an implicit threat, however. Schreiber's actions should be investigated by the Florida Bar and the Florida Commission on Ethics.

In an e-mail message to his staff last week, Schreiber asked for a minimum of $100 from each employee in an effort to raise $50,000 for the would-be pro, Craig Pawling, who is also Schreiber's golf coach. He defended the request by saying he wasn't forcing anyone to donate. That's technically true. But how would any sensible employee react to such a request when it carries the signature "The Boss Man"?

Schreiber also makes the ridiculous claim that the money wouldn't be a gift but rather an investment, "because he [Pawling] would be inclined to share any winnings." He concedes, however, that Pawling has made no such commitment.

Schreiber's attitude about his lapse in judgment is almost as appalling as the lapse itself. He actually quipped that it wouldn't be a bad thing if it got him on the front page of the newspaper.

After 28 years in office, Schreiber is not seeking re-election this year, so maybe he thinks he needn't worry about ethics or appearances anymore. That's a sad commentary on his respect for the office he holds and the trust placed in him by the public.

What was he thinking?

 

[Index to Articles]
 

A Feast

Take Action

Judicial Accountability | Judicial Independence | Discipline State Court Judges
Appeals-State Court | Disposal of JQC & Other Records | Discipline Federal Court Judges | Appeals -Federal Court | Judicial Canons | Violation of Separation of Powers
History of the Bar | Privatization of the Bar | Unauthorized Appropriation of Funds
The Judicial Bar Rules | Unauthorized Bar Functions | Law is Big Business | Endnotes